![]() Minutiae was given major attention as well there was a great outpouring of debate over the decision to give Peter Parker organic web shooters in the original comic book, our teen genius invented them.Īnd when Sam Raimi was announced as the director, fans didn't know how to react. reportedly campaigned for the role) were hotly debated. Who might direct it (David Fincher was a contender) and who might star (Freddie Prinze Jr. (A note: This strike, which was all the buzz in Hollywood right before it was narrowly averted, led to a great number of films made on a rushed schedule that may have been better served had the industry not been making poor decisions like a drunk trying to get laid once the bar has announced last-call.) Spider-Man was under the microscope even before it was released, with every facet held in check. It was a big summer release that hoped to become a franchise it had been kicking around Hollywood for decades with James Cameron attached for a long period (he also was attached to the previous year's Planet of the Apes remake as well, so his presence was not necessarily a good sign) and, perhaps most troubling of all, the shoot was fast-tracked because of the big actors/directors/writers strike that was expected to occur in the summer of 2001, but did not. Surely the 2002 release of Spider-Man had the deck stacked against it, and the fanboys were ready to pounce. Then again, after 20 years of bad adaptations, can we really blame them? Actually, after Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone (2001), a new criticism was created by this Borg-like entity: It can also be "too faithful." It seems this cast exists solely to be disappointed. It's a recognized personality (the "fanboy"), one that the Internet has given a voice, and they seem to exist almost solely to decry any effort that in any way meddles with the sacred comic-book text. Let's put it this way: There's a reason why Fox-TV's The Simpsons has a "Comic Book Guy" character. Not because it's difficult to translate one medium to another (although that's certainly true), but because dedicated fans are critical to the point of viciousness. And you couldn't pick a worse time to adapt a comic book. Sam Raimi's Spider-Man is leading the charge, and Daredevil, The Hulk, Hellboy, and a new Superman are on the way.īut after Dick Tracy, after Brenda Starr, after Flash Gordon, after From Hell, the minefield has been planted for any filmmaker who dares trod in the comic-book domain. Even so, a wave of titles is now at its peak after the relative success of X-Men (2000) which, in retrospect, wasn't so much good as it wasn't bad. Nonetheless, the comic-to-film translation has wielded few films that succeed on any level, and though there are the exceptions, the list of poor comic-book movies is long and varied and those good exceptions have fueled much of the worst of it. They have a visceral and visual quality that should be a shoo-in for the medium. With their storyboard-like structures, comic books seem like they would make an easy transition to big-screen movies. James Franco, and Cliff Robertson Written by David Koepp (with Alvin Sargent)īased on the Comic Book by Sam Ditko and Stan Lee Directed by Sam Raimi Spider-Man: Special Edition Columbia TriStar Home Entertainment Starring Tobey Maguire, Willem Dafoe, Kirsten Dunst ![]() The DVD Journal | Reviews : Spider-Man: Special Edition
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |